Smart Trading Field
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Investing

FISA Section 702 Noncompliance Records: 39,650 Pages Worth?

by June 9, 2026
by June 9, 2026 0 comment

Patrick G. Eddington

FBI

Sometimes, the Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DoJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) will let slip in court filings things that deserve to be front-page news and the top story trending online. This is one such example. 

It deals with the potential volume of FBI Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 noncompliance incidents spanning the period from roughly June 9, 2023, through at least August 19, 2024, that are currently the subject of a Cato Institute Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed on October 4, 2024. 

The key text is from page two of what is known as a Joint Status Report (JSR), a document opposing parties file in FOIA litigation to update the court on the current status of the case. It was filed on June 4, 2026:

Screenshot from Cato v FBI 24-cv-2839 JSR of June 4 2026

Is it possible that the number is inflated due to the counting of duplicate records? Yes, but it’s unlikely the rate of inflation on the actual number of responsive records is anything like 100 percent or more. I should also note that this is only one of several ongoing Cato Institute FOIA lawsuits seeking the release of these kinds of records.

What’s also noteworthy about this FBI revelation is the litigation tactic being employed in this case. Instead of making immediate, rolling productions of responsive records as they become available, the Bureau is slow-rolling the release process—“The FBI anticipates making its first monthly release of records…on August 15, 2026”—and that initial release will be a paltry 128 pages. 

All of this matters because the FISA Section 702 program is set to expire in three days (June 12), unless Congress takes action to temporarily extend the spy power. So we now have 1) Senator Ron Wyden (D‑OR) being stonewalled in his attempts to get an explosive, damaging FISA court opinion released, and 2) Cato receiving the same treatment from the DOJ and FBI on a mountain of potentially relevant surveillance noncompliance incidents—all happening before yet another key vote on this deeply troubled and arguably unconstitutional mass electronic surveillance dragnet power. Coincidence?

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Trump Accounts: Good Idea, Bad Design
next post
Is There a Federal AI Framework? What the Obernolte-Trahan Bill Means for the AI Policy Debate

You may also like

The Wrong War at Sea

June 9, 2026

The Doomslayers Are Shaping America’s Energy Policy

June 9, 2026

Forced Labor Tariffs: Righteous Rhetoric, Dubious Logic

June 9, 2026

Is There a Federal AI Framework? What the...

June 9, 2026

Trump Accounts: Good Idea, Bad Design

June 9, 2026

Possible Higher Education Budget Reforms on the Horizon

June 9, 2026

AI, 7-OH, and the Illusion of Scientific Uncertainty

June 8, 2026

Restoring the Right to Trial by Jury: How...

June 8, 2026

The FCC’s Public Interest Notice Is a House...

June 8, 2026

The Trump Administration’s WTO Filing Exposes the Bad...

June 5, 2026

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smarttradingfield.com | All Rights Reserved

    Smart Trading Field
    • Politics
    • Investing
    • Tech News
    • Stock
    • Editor’s Pick