Smart Trading Field
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Tech News
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
Investing

Why Are Democratic States Suing to Allow for More Student Loan Debt?

by May 20, 2026
by May 20, 2026 0 comment

Andrew Gillen

college students

After years of political fights over excessive student loan debt, there is a new, surprising twist. Twenty-five states with a Democrat governor and the District of Columbia are suing the Trump administration to allow students to take on more student loan debt. What’s going on?

As background, last year’s reconciliation bill made a host of beneficial changes to student loans, and one of the most important changes was phasing out the Grad PLUS student loan program. Graduate students (e.g., those pursuing a master’s or doctoral degree) can already borrow up to $20,500 per year from the main (Stafford) student loan program, and that remains unchanged. But Grad PLUS was implemented in 2006-07 to allow graduate students to borrow up to whatever their college decided was appropriate. It should not come as a surprise that colleges exploited the program to raise tuition, leaving colleges richer and students with more debt. 

Ending Grad PLUS was the right move. 

But there was a problem. While the remaining limit of $20,500 per year is enough for most graduate programs, there are some, like medical school, where providing the education is very costly, and students should arguably have access to higher loan limits. The legislation therefore increased the $20,500 limit to $50,000 for “professional” programs, pointing to a definition of “professional” in previous regulations. Unfortunately, the regulatory definition was not definitive. I happened to sit on the committee tasked with determining which programs are eligible for the higher loan limits based on the ”statute, congressional intent, and ambiguous regulatory text.” The committee used the existing examples already in regulatory text (law, medicine, dentistry, etc.) and then included any other fields that were similar, with clinical psychology being the only field that was sufficiently similar to warrant adding to the list. 

This distinction came to a head with nurses. While undergraduate nurses are completely unaffected, students attending graduate nursing programs are now limited to $20,500 per year in debt. Colleges with nursing programs want them to take on more debt so they can charge more, and therefore want these programs to be classified as professional, which would then allow students to take on $50,000 of debt per year. 

This is a terrible deal for the nurses in graduate programs. The PR message is that the Trump administration is disrespecting nurses by failing to classify them as professional. This is wrong for two reasons.

First, it is a misreading of what professional means in this context. The professional distinction was for decades merely a categorization tool for the Department of Education with no practical effect on students or colleges. This obscure definition matters now only because it determines how much debt students can take on. It was never designed to be, nor was it ever considered the government’s official determination of which professions are considered professional in an everyday context. For instance, no undergraduate program is categorized as professional, but that clearly doesn’t mean that accountants, teachers, and nurses are not professionals in the everyday sense of the word. 

Second, if this lawsuit succeeds, it would be a Pyrrhic victory. The only practical impact would be to load up nurses and other graduate students with more student loan debt. Being categorized as professional in a government database isn’t worth an extra $29,500 per year in student loan debt. 

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
What are the Effects of Reform Prosecutors?
next post
The Long Road to CLARITY

You may also like

After the Castro Tyranny, Cubans Should Lead Their...

May 20, 2026

A Federal Gas Tax Holiday Would Be Expensive...

May 20, 2026

The SEC Throws in the Towel on Gag...

May 20, 2026

Banks Are Not Immigration Enforcement, Mr. President

May 20, 2026

The Long Road to CLARITY

May 20, 2026

What are the Effects of Reform Prosecutors?

May 20, 2026

Trump Promises End to America’s Slush Fund Shortage

May 20, 2026

It’s Time to Curb the Consumer Financial Protection...

May 20, 2026

Free Choice in Currency, or the Case for...

May 19, 2026

Why Are Crime Victims the Only People We...

May 19, 2026

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 smarttradingfield.com | All Rights Reserved

    Smart Trading Field
    • Politics
    • Investing
    • Tech News
    • Stock
    • Editor’s Pick